Threats are a part of everyday life of a Samoan reporter, of any news journalist for that matter, but that’s ok, its part of the job.
It’s like the nurse in the ER, blood is part of their job, or like the construction worker, dirt, splinters and dust are all part of their livelihood.
So threats are therefore an accepted part of the job of a journalist, we laugh it off sometimes, how else do you deal with it, because if we really took it seriously, there would be no one left in the media industry, and you wouldn’t get your news at all.,
Threats of a personal nature are the usual sort we get, which means each person has to fend for themselves, but sometimes, threats are directed at the whole news team, at the whole news organization, and that, that is not funny.
Taking matters personally is a fine trait perfected by humanity on a daily basis, we all do it, no one is above it, perhaps we as Samoans are better at this than any other people, because of our fierce pride in who we are.
Many a times we have witnessed village feuds over minor criticisms and offences, many a times we have dodged rocks flying from one neighbour to the next after a child accidentally calls out the fault of another family. Its part of life, and our culture only serves to preserve this pride, and righteously so.
Last week a senior official in Government threatened one Newsline news reporter of pulling all advertising from their Ministry if the reporter went ahead with the story.
Now as mentioned, the threat is not a problem, but rather what the threat held and implicated.
If the reporter wrote the story, and the newspaper was to publish it, then Ministry funded advertisements would cease, which is a direct threat to the livelihood of the reporter speaking.
Now it’s ok if this was a dictatorial government and the one speaking from the other end was the dictator, but as we all know this is an alleged democratic state, and the last we checked, freedom of expression is the fourth estate of such a form of governance.
In a country that specializes in shooting the messenger, this is no surprise.
But when the bullet is empty, it makes the killing a bit harder.
Analogy aside, the fact is, the news reporter seeking comment on the story was merely doing their job and giving the involved Ministry a right of reply.
The aim was to seek the other side of the story, so threatening on behalf of a Ministry of the Government of Samoa funded in part by the people of Samoa is not really in good taste.
But the explanation by one of the officers of the Ministry almost broke this writers heart.
It was out of frustration, he said and it was nothing serious, so because to err is human and to forgive divine, we will take the latter and do no denying for the prior.
Our Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister are the only Government leaders in the world to be honoured with Press Freedom awards for their efforts in Samoa, the fact that they received these awards reflect their intentions if not practices to ensure the concepts of transparency, accountability and good governance.
Now as the Cook Islands look to pass the first ever Freedom of Information bill in small island states, perhaps we should explore this possibility to avoid any misunderstandings that public companies and Government Ministries are indeed accountable to the public.
What is hard to understand is that more often this is the intention of Ministers and those who lead each Ministry and some Chief Executive Officers, but it rarely trickles down, which is perhaps where the problem lies.
So it is apparent that it is not enough to have the intention to seem transparent, but also to practice it, as the Prime Minister loves to say: “We are not hiding anything.”
Then this should not be a problem then, should it?
Ia manuia le aso.
|