Seasonal workers under the scheme that is already in place with New Zealand is proving popular with our unemployed.
The monitoring process is also very stringent as far as our workers are concerned. Step out of line and you are whisked back home on the next available flight to Samoa.
The concern is that we cannot afford to jeopardize the opportunity with personal indiscretions that will deny the chance for others. So it is all good.
Wages are either sent home to the family or banked into a personal account to be collected on the return home. Nothing wrong with that either.
Now we have Australia coming into the picture with the same offer. Our unemployed will undoubtedly jump when the opportunity is available.
After doing it for a while now, the people involved in running the scheme from our end should be well versed on the ins and outs of what is involved and the requirements for the people taking up the offer.
Still there are a few catches that seems to be emerging out of the Australian contribution to the scheme, that one wonders if it has been addressed or will be before our workers start flying out.
People dream and the offer of employment in a land that offers hope of building a dream house for the family is enticing enough for any unemployed person to jump in blindly.
But the critics of the Australian scheme are saying that it was found out from an earlier scheme that the workers were abused and threatened with being sent home by the owners or their employers.
A scenario put across on what the workers were up against under that scheme was rather alarming because it could easily be true. Here is how a conversation went between a protesting worker and employer/owner in the scenario.
Worker: Boss, I'm not getting some rights and entitlements I should be getting under Australian law.
Employer: I'm giving you $10 an hour. If you were at home you'd be getting $2 an hour.
Worker: Boss, I'm working very long hours, I haven't had a day off for months and I'm not getting overtime rates like Australians get.
Employer: You ungrateful sod. Put your head down and keep working or you will be on a plane home.
End of scenario.
Granted this maybe a different scheme from what is now being proposed by Australia. but under this new plan for import workers, are the rates being offered fair in terms of the work and the hours involved?
Are the rates subject to negotiations, or is it on a take it or leave it basis?
Eventually the novelty of being employed and visiting a place so many people talk about, will wear out.
The hard reality starts to set in and the workers are quick to realize that picking fruits is not so romantic where it matter the most – money pocket.
Under the current New Zealand scheme, the workers return home after a specified period- the same will apply for Australia.
They will need to reapply if they want to fruit pick again. Can they negotiate for a higher rate without fear of being signaled as a bad apple that will threaten the barrel?
If that is the case, does that fall into the same scenario of the boss and the protesting worker?
Since we are the ones asking for jobs and New Zealand and Australia are responding to our employment needs, along with others in the region, are we in this case beggars?
If we are, does that mean we should not complain about our working rates because we are beggars?
It is unfair but unfortunately that's the reality of this world,unless people start standing up for their rights and make a stand it will continue on this way where the employee will find themselves at the mercy of their employer,especially if they're from overseas.Maybe Samoa needs to find ways where they don't need to go overseas to work and try and create jobs within the country so they can become more self sufficient and less reliant on other countries ,better for the individual and for Samoa as a nation stepping up in the global map. One thing is those who sign up for these schemes are not beggars,beggars don't work for their money they plea and ask,these guys do the hard labour so that classifies them as legimate workers who earn their keep and should be paid accordingly no more no less.In my opinion the pay should be equal to what a person would get if they were living in that country where the work is being done.Be wary with the Australian scheme that scenario put out is quite similar to many of those who live here on a permanent basis where the employer has more power over the employee thanks to the old Howard Government so it would be good for those to really look into the contract scheme involving Australia and to make sure both parties come to a fair reasonable agreement when it comes to people coming over for seasonal work.People shouldn't be afraid of negotiating out of fear of ending up without a job,better to still have your dignity and voice your opinion then not say anything at all ,it's only fair to ask for higher working rates if it equals the labour time put in no matter where you may come from.
Contact? written by Anonymous,
August 11, 2008
Hi,
Just read the above article and i was wondering who the suppliers are from Australia & who the contract is going through? I don't think it was mentioned. I understand this article was written a couple of months ago, but is this a sure thing with people from Samoa coming to Australia to pick? if you could please answer these couple of questions, it would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you L.I
seasonal workers written by fia,
August 12, 2008
Is there a blue print for the almost perfect scheme that we are unaware of? There will alway be unscruplous people everywhere. And if we seriously believe our book of life...they w.ere all made in the image of G*d. Samoa on the other hand does not only want this, she needs it! The Australian govt has yet to debate this.....Mr Rudd will present smthing at the Forum meeting Niue mid/late Aug. So, what is my point you may well ask? Nothing has been confirmed as yet. On a personal level, I can't wait for all my usos to come here & experience the 'easy & good' life I have....next time they call collect asking for money for all the faalavelaves that dear uncle so & so who is the biggest chief in 3/4 districts or something.... or aunty So who's married to the toeaina of the church blahblah or some other irrelevant faalavelave to my current life.....and then claim ua se o le ga kama ia ua makua palagai lava la e ka'a solo i Ausekalia! Ae aka laku fo'i i Samoa e kake sau lava o la kake shout lava...ae le shout lava le vaega! LOL Oi aue ...Come walk in my shoes .....ia kalosia ia omai uma si makou aiga sei fai se makou fale kalimalo pe faakau foi le Tusitala iga nei ma'imau kupe a le au fai lafoga. Ia manuia uma oukou alo ma fanau a Samoa i fafo ma Samoa.
Submit News from your Area If you would like to submit News for possible publication in both the online and print version of Newsline please feel free to email us at
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Become a News Blogger Have a passion for writing? Interested in writing articles for Newsline? Email us at
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
. We are looking for Bloggers from around the world to contribute to our site.
One thing is those who sign up for these schemes are not beggars,beggars don't work for their money they plea and ask,these guys do the hard labour so that classifies them as legimate workers who earn their keep and should be paid accordingly no more no less.In my opinion the pay should be equal to what a person would get if they were living in that country where the work is being done.Be wary with the Australian scheme that scenario put out is quite similar to many of those who live here on a permanent basis where the employer has more power over the employee thanks to the old Howard Government